|
ENRON-ISM
|
|
I was cruising along Bellfountain Road heading into town listening to a
PBS report about alleged(?) political influence resulting from huge financial
donations by Enron. |
The commentator gave the impression that she was shocked. |
I was shocked that she—or anyone—was shocked. |
Call it “economic determinism.” |
Call it “the American way.” |
Call it “Enron-ism.” |
I wished I had a place to pull off the road and write it down. “Enron-ism.”
I liked the sound of it. A new description for an old, old reality. |
I heard a politician discuss the realities of political activity. “You
bet money talks. Without money I don’t hold office. I have to listen to
the money in order to be here to do the important things I believe in.” |
That reminded me of a minister I once knew who occupied the pulpit —isn’t
that a strange way to talk, “occupy the pulpit”?—of a large church. He
reported that his ministry in that church, and in fact the continuation
of that church, depended on the financial support of one wealthy member.
He made a point of keeping that man happy. |
Is there “Enron-ism” within the sacred walls? |
I began to think of other situations that were money-dependent. I heard
recently of a church where a major contributor disagreed with her minister’s
biblical understanding and pulled the plug on him, so to speak. In the
trade we often called such people of influence, “weightier brethren.” In
this case it was “weightier sistern.” “Enron-ism.” |
In Seminary, or someplace, I was warned that this sort of thing happened
in churches. Individuals of major wealth could sway the towers, or bring
them down. The preacher might be temped to adjust or moderate thinking
to please the contributor(s). My practice was to stay away from the contribution
reports. I never knew who gave what, and hoped that might keep me from
being “Enron-ed.” |
One time, apparently, some folks in one church tried to get my attention
by withholding contributions. The idea was that I was supposed to note
their action and go find out why. I never showed up because I never even
knew. |
I’m sure it’s human nature to pay attention to those who offer benefit
to us. The Congress and other elected officials are not alone in this.
Even wait persons are more likely to extend extra service to those known
to give large tips. |
All this reminded me of one of my favorite Bible texts. I wonder whether
I ever preached it? It’s found in the Phillip’s translation of the Book
of Acts (8:20):
“To hell with you
and your money!”
|
Phillips added a footnote pointing out that no matter how other Bible versions
translate the Greek, this is exactly what the original says. |
The words are credited to Peter, a founding Christian. He had a chance
to collect some money from a man who thought he could buy anything, including
the gifts of God. No “Enron-ism” for Peter. |
I’ve wandered a bit. I’m sure I had sharper ideas as I was driving along.
I guess I just wanted to plant the “Enron-ism” idea. Once you see it anywhere
you can see it everywhere. If we’re not careful the “government of the
people, by the people, and for the people” turns into the government
of the rich, by the rich, and for the rich. As Phillips translates
Timothy (6:10) |
“Loving money leads to all kinds of evil.” |
Give us some politicians (and clergy) with the back bone of Peter to say:
“To hell with
you and your money!”
|
Away with Enron-ism!
—
Art Morgan, February 1, 2002
|